ScienceHistorical
Does Christianity Conflict with Science?
Does Christianity go against science? Can one be both scientific and Christian?
Last updated: 01/08/2025
TL;DR

Christianity and Science: Partners, Not Enemies


Contrary to popular belief, Christianity and science are not in conflict. In fact, the Christian worldview provided the foundational assumptions that made modern science possible. Historians of science now recognize that the "Conflict Thesis"—the idea that religion and science have always been at war—is largely a 19th-century invention[1]. Many of history's greatest scientists were devout Christians, and Christianity continues to support scientific inquiry today.



Historical Foundation: Christianity Birthed Modern Science



The Christian Worldview Made Science Possible: Several Christian beliefs were essential for science to flourish[2]


Rational God: A logical God created an orderly, comprehensible universe.


Human Reason: Made in God's image, humans possess the capacity to understand creation.


Natural Laws: God governs creation through consistent, discoverable laws rather than capricious magic.


Empirical Investigation: Because God is free, we cannot deduce how nature works; we must observe and test it (honoring God's freedom).



Medieval Christian Foundations: The groundwork was laid in Christian institutions[3]


• Universities (Bologna, Oxford, Paris) were founded by the Church.


• The Scholastic method emphasized rigorous logic, reason, and debate.


• Monasteries preserved Greek and Roman texts during times of upheaval.


• Scholars like Roger Bacon and Albert the Great pioneered early experimental methods.



The Statistical Reality: Faith in the Sciences



The Nobel Difference: History proves that scientific excellence and faith are not mutually exclusive. A comprehensive review of Nobel Prizes awarded between 1901 and 2000 reveals a striking dominance of Christian belief[4]:


65.4% of all Nobel Laureates identified as Christians.


72.5% of Chemistry laureates were Christian.


65.3% of Physics laureates were Christian.


• This starkly contradicts the narrative that "real scientists" are atheists.



Christian Scientists: The Founders of Modern Science



The Scientific Revolution Led by Christians: Major pioneers were believers who saw science as an act of worship[5]


Isaac Newton: Laws of motion, gravity, calculus - wrote more on theology than physics.


Johannes Kepler: Planetary motion laws - described his work as "thinking God's thoughts after Him."


Robert Boyle: Father of modern chemistry - founded the Royal Society to glorify God.


Galileo Galilei: "Mathematics is the language God used to write the universe."



Christian Priest-Scientists: Many clergy were renowned scientists[6]


Georges Lemaître: Belgian priest who formulated the Big Bang theory (originally called the "hypothesis of the primeval atom").


Gregor Mendel: Augustinian friar and father of modern genetics.


Nicolas Steno: Bishop and founder of geology and stratigraphy.


Angelo Secchi: Jesuit priest and pioneer of astrophysics.



Modern Christian Scientists: Faith continues to inspire scientific work[7]


Michael Faraday: Electromagnetic theory - a devout Sandemanian Christian.


James Clerk Maxwell: Unified electricity and magnetism - an elder in the Presbyterian church.


Louis Pasteur: Microbiology - "The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator."


Francis Collins: Leader of the Human Genome Project - converted from atheism to Christianity.



Scientific Evidence Supporting Christian Beliefs



Cosmological Evidence (SURGE): The universe had a beginning[8]


Second Law of Thermodynamics: The universe is running down, implying a beginning.


Universe Expansion: Hubble's discovery shows the universe expanding from a single point.


Radiation Afterglow: Cosmic Microwave Background confirms the Big Bang event.


Great Galaxy Seeds: Precise temperature variations allowed for galaxy formation.


Einstein's General Relativity: Proved that space, time, and matter are co-relative and had a beginning.



Fine-Tuning Evidence: The universe appears "rigged" for life[9]


• The cosmological constant is fine-tuned to 1 part in 10¹²⁰.


• The strong nuclear force is precisely balanced; a 2% change would eliminate life.


The Privileged Planet: Earth is positioned not only for life but also for scientific discovery (e.g., perfect solar eclipses).



Biological Evidence: Information and complexity point to design[10]


• DNA contains functional, specified digital information, which in our experience only comes from a mind.


• Irreducible complexity in molecular machines (like the bacterial flagellum) challenges gradualistic explanations.


• The Cambrian Explosion reveals the sudden appearance of complex animal body plans without precursors.



The Philosophical Necessity of God



The Reliability of the Mind: Why can we trust science?[11]


The Atheist's Dilemma: If the human brain is the result of unguided evolution, it is selected for survival, not truth. A belief can be false but useful for survival (e.g., avoiding tigers). Therefore, on naturalism, we have no guarantee our cognitive faculties are reliable.


The Christian's Foundation: We can trust our minds to understand the universe because they were designed by the same God who designed the universe. Science is only possible because of the "Logos" (rationality) inherent in both God and man.



The Concept of Linear Time: The engine of progress[12]


• Ancient pagan cultures viewed time as cyclical (eternal repetition), which stifled the idea of progress.


• Christianity introduced Linear Time (Creation → Fall → Redemption → Consummation). This unique worldview gave birth to the idea that we can learn, improve, and build upon the past—the very heart of the scientific method.



The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics:


• Physicist Eugene Wigner noted the "miracle" that abstract mathematics (created in the human mind) perfectly describes the physical universe.


• This points to a deep congruence between the human mind and the cosmos, suggesting both are products of the same Divine Mind.



The Hard Problem of Consciousness: Mind cannot be reduced to matter[13]


• Naturalism struggles to explain qualia (subjective experience)—why we feel pain, see red, or experience love, rather than just processing data like a computer.


• If we are just "atoms in motion," free will and reasoning are illusions. Theism grounds consciousness in the primary reality of God, who is Spirit.



Theology and Philosophy of Science



The "Two Books" Doctrine: A historic Christian view of revelation[14]


The Book of Scripture: God reveals His will, salvation, and moral character through the Bible.


The Book of Nature: God reveals His power, divinity, and glory through the created order (Psalm 19, Romans 1).


Compatibility: Since both books have the same Author, they cannot contradict. Any apparent conflict is a result of human error in interpreting either Scripture (bad theology) or Nature (bad science).



Refuting the "God of the Gaps": Finding God in what we know, not what we don't[15]


• Skeptics often claim Christians use "God" as a plug for scientific ignorance. This is false.


The Christian View: We do not worship a God who hides in the dark corners of unsolved physics; we worship the God who is the ground of the entire illuminated picture.


• Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote: "We should find God in what we do know, not in what we don't know." The very intelligibility of the universe—the fact that science works at all—is the miracle pointing to a Creator.



Addressing Supposed Conflicts



The Galileo Myth: History is more nuanced than "Science vs. Religion"[16]


• The conflict was largely about biblical interpretation and academic politics, not the validity of science.


• Galileo remained a devout Catholic and defended his views using Augustine's theology.


• The scientific consensus of the time (Aristotelian) actually opposed Galileo; the Church asked for proof, which he lacked at the time.



Evolution and Christianity: Diverse views exist within the faith[17]


Theistic Evolution: God used the process of evolution to create (BioLogos view).


Intelligent Design: Certain features of the universe and living things are best explained by an intelligent cause.


Old/Young Earth Creationism: Differing views on the timeline, but all affirm God as the Sovereign Creator.



Age of the Earth: Vital for context but secondary to salvation[18]


• Christians hold various interpretations of Genesis 1 (24-hour days vs. Day-Age vs. Literary Framework).


• The primary theological truth is that God created, not necessarily when.



Christianity's Positive Impact on Science



Institutional Support: The Church was the incubator of science[19]


• The Royal Society of London was founded by Christians to study creation for "God's glory."


• The Vatican Observatory is one of the oldest astronomical research institutes in the world.



Ethical Framework: Christian values guide scientific practice[20]


• Human dignity (Imago Dei) shapes medical ethics and human rights in research.


• Stewardship of the earth motivates environmental science.


• The commitment to truth-telling reflects the divine character.



The Limits of Science (Scientism vs. Science)


It is important to distinguish between Science (a method for investigating the natural world) and Scientism (the philosophical belief that science is the only way to know truth). Science cannot answer questions of:[21]


Logic and Math: Science presupposes logic and math; it cannot prove them.


Metaphysical Truths: Questions like "Why are we here?" or "Do other minds exist?" are outside the scope of the scientific method.


Ethics and Morality: Science can tell you how to split an atom, but not if you should use it to build a bomb.


Aesthetics: Science cannot quantify beauty or the profound impact of music and art.



Modern Testimonies



Allan Sandage (1926-2010): The father of modern astronomy[22]


"I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing."



Contemporary Leaders:[23]


Francis Collins: Former Director of the NIH, leader of the Human Genome Project.


Jennifer Wiseman: Senior Project Scientist for the Hubble Space Telescope.


John Lennox: Professor of Mathematics at Oxford, renowned apologist.



Biblical Foundation for Scientific Inquiry



God's Creation Declares His Glory: "The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge" (Psalm 19:1-2)



God's Invisible Qualities Revealed in Creation: "For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made" (Romans 1:20)



Christ as Creator: "For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible... all things have been created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together" (Colossians 1:16-17)



Faith and Understanding of Creation: "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible" (Hebrews 11:3)



God's Wisdom in Creation: "It is the glory of God to conceal a matter; to search out a matter is the glory of kings" (Proverbs 25:2)



Conclusion


Rather than being enemies, Christianity and science are natural allies. The Christian worldview provided the foundation for modern science, Christian scientists made most major discoveries, and Christian values continue to guide ethical scientific practice. True conflict exists not between Christianity and science, but between the philosophy of naturalism (nature is all there is) and theistic belief[24].


Key Bible Verses
Genesis 1:1
Psalm 19:1-2
Romans 1:20
Colossians 1:16-17
Hebrews 11:3
Job 38:4-7
Isaiah 40:26
Proverbs 25:2
Sources & Further Reading